Thursday, September 15, 2011

Letter to the Minister for Energy Re: Sale of ESB

Dear Pat,
I am writing to you about the ownership of the electricity grid and the sale of ESB. In particular I am urging decoupling of the grid from the ESB prior to any sale of the state utility.

Firstly, the creation of a competitive electricity market in Ireland is incomplete. ESB remains a dominant player, and its ownership of the grid allows it to influence investment decisions that effect the whole market. Our principle aim must be to create a competitive industry where other smaller companies get a fair crack of the whip. A large dominant player is neither economically sensible nor fair to the smaller competitors. Consumers, including employers, suffer from the resultant high electricity prices.

Secondly, I am extremely concerned that we will not gain the full value of the transmission grid in any sale if it is bundled with the ESB. Because the grid is operated by Eirgrid, it is therefore not an attractive investment for private investors. No sensible investor wants to pay full price for an asset they will not be allowed to operate. By selling the grid with ESB, I believe we are doomed to accept a price that is substantially below the true value of the grid. It can only be sold for full price if Eirgrid is sold along with the grid (although I definitely do no advocate this).

Therefore, both to improve competition and to safeguard the value of State assets, I urge you to decouple the grid from the ESB prior to any sale of the ESB.

Letter to the Minister for Transport

Dear Leo
I am writing to you about the proposed sell-off of the remainder of Aer Lingus. In particular I am writing to emphasise the critical importance of retaining effective State control over the landing slots currently in Aer Lingus' posession.

In my view, the part-privatisation of Aer Lingus with its slots was a mistake. The slots should have been removed from the company (decoupled) prior to the part-sale of the airline. We now face a difficulty in selling off the remainder of the company without endangering these vital assets of national importance.

Unlike the review group on State Assets, I do not believe we should trust blindly to the market to deliver high quality flight connections to Ireland. Indeed, our flight connections are currently the envy of other countries, primarily because, as an island state, we identified the crucial value of air travel at any early stage and developed it aggressively over the last century. If the market alone had dictated our flight connections we would have far fewer and far less high quality connections than at present. But as an industry of national importance we have actively collected high quality flight connections.

I read that it is the Department's intention to insert clauses into the sale of the State's shares to safeguard the landing slots. However, clauses such as this are ripe for failure: companies are liquidated, dismembered, they surrender assets -there are myriad ways in which such clauses can lose their effect.

Rather, I urge you, prior to any sale of Aer Lingus, to devise a "Sale-and-leaseback" agreement with Aer Lingus so that the state can regain ownership of the slots. Such an agreement will not be cheap, but it will be more than paid for by the subsequent sale and is the only way to guarantee our control over the foreign landing slots that successive governments have gathered. Frankly, they are vital to tourism, business and our globally integrated economy and their worth to the country far exceeds their market worth to the airline.

Otherwise, I guarantee you that the chinese or the oil sheikhs, or some such investor, with lots of money and poor flight connections will snap them up and deprive us of these vital assets. Countries that are less well endowed with flight connections, are better placed to appreciate their true worth. We have become complacent when we think we can simply sell our principle connections to the outside world.